If I remember correctly, the blue car came with a white roof - the white roof feature seemed to be peculiar (and desirable) for cars going back to '60s.
Regarding crankshafts - five main bearing crank vs. seven - it is an interesting anomaly, observation ? Not sure how to put it. I came across this situation with the Rover P5 3 litre sixes. Up to 1964, they had a five bearing main crank, but the following year they changed the block to accept a seven crank. Those models were known as the Mark IIc and Mark III, but the Coupe that I always owned was a Mark IIa. What I found was that the seven bearing crank engines were dead smooth, but had no revvability, and fuel consumption also sufferd to the tune of about three miles to the gallon. I have a notebook in my possession from a previous owner that could only obtain 19.5 mpg on the open road - that was with an automatic. My manual Coupe with the five bearing crank, albeit 4 speed with overdrive, gave 25.0 mpg on trips. Allow about three mpg (worse) for an auto, and you can clearly see the difference.
There was another story that concerned Aston Martin, Le Mans and Stirling Moss, but maybe that's for another time. However thus, I wonder how all this translates to 220/250 and then the M130 2.8 litre engine fuel consumption wise ? Does anyone know ?
Bill, my personal preference are the 6 cylinder engines when compared with the V8 engined Coupes. Main reason relates to the interior - it's just that bit nicer. BTW, if anyone wants a brochure on the Coupes, I do have some original ones - not to give away (sorry), but to sell. Regards Styria